Panama, Venezuela, and the U.S.: Maritime Disputes and International Law

In December 2025, an international maritime incident brought Panama, Venezuela, and the United States into a tense confrontation over a tanker carrying Venezuelan crude oil. The Panama-flagged supertanker Centuries was intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard as part of America’s effort to enforce sanctions and prevent sanction evasion by Venezuelan oil shipments. Panama, however, criticized the tanker’s conduct, stating that it did not comply with maritime rules.

Panama’s Foreign Minister, Javier Martinez-Acha, explained that the tanker had switched off its transponder, a key device for tracking vessels at sea. Such action violates international maritime regulations and Panama’s own rules governing ships registered under its flag. Panama emphasized its authority to enforce compliance and indicated that it could take punitive measures, including potentially revoking the ship’s registration. This response underscores the responsibilities of flag states to ensure that their vessels follow safety and navigation protocols in international waters.


The United States, for its part, has been intensifying its enforcement of sanctions against Venezuela. By intercepting and boarding tankers in international waters, the U.S. aims to curb illicit oil exports that could finance activities it considers destabilizing. While Washington justifies these actions as legal under its sanctions regime, the measures have provoked strong reactions from both Venezuela and Panama, raising questions about the balance between national enforcement and respect for maritime law.

Venezuela condemned the interception as an act of “piracy” and passed legislation targeting foreign blockades, reflecting its determination to assert sovereignty over its oil exports. Other international actors have also criticized U.S. interventions, highlighting the complex interplay of law, geopolitics, and economic interests in the region.

In conclusion, the tanker incident illustrates the growing challenges in maritime governance, particularly when national sanctions collide with international shipping practices. Panama’s insistence on compliance with maritime rules, Venezuela’s defense of sovereignty, and the U.S.’s enforcement actions collectively reveal how legal, economic, and strategic interests intersect in global maritime operations. The episode highlights the urgent need for clearer frameworks to manage disputes over international waters, sanctions, and the movement of commercial vessels.

Previous Post Next Post